yoagent

Library Listed

The agent loop for Rust: stream from 7 LLM protocols, run tools, loop until done. Native or wasm32 (Cloudflare Workers).

Checked · Sources

Downloads
2,027
Dependents
5
Stars
369
Forks
53
Contributors
6
Commits
464
Latest release
0.27.4 ·

About

From the project README ·

yoagent

Getting started · Design philosophy · Docs · API · Changelog · 中文

The agent loop for Rust. Stream from any LLM protocol, run tools and extensions, loop until done.

A loop library, not an agent: it powers yoyo, a coding agent evolving its own source since March 2026. Your agent ships as one native binary, or builds for wasm32 to run in a Cloudflare Worker.

The yoagent loop: prompt, context, LLM stream, tool calls through a gate and back, a finish check, limits, and the Extension hooks at each step


Try it in one command — no API key

git clone https://github.com/yologdev/yoagent && cd yoagent
ollama serve &
ollama pull llama3.1:8b                           # or pass --model <any pulled model>
cargo run --example cli -- --provider ollama

That's a working coding agent in your terminal — file read/write/edit, shell, ripgrep search, streaming output, skills. No signup, no key, nothing to configure.

  yoagent cli — mini coding agent
  Type /quit to exit, /clear to reset

  model: llama3.1:8b
  cwd:   /home/user/my-project

> find all TODO comments in src/

  ▶ search 'TODO' ✓

Found 3 TODOs:
  src/main.rs:42: // TODO: handle edge case
  src/lib.rs:15:  // TODO: add tests
  src/utils.rs:8: // TODO: optimize this

  tokens: 1250 in / 89 out

Point it at a hosted model instead by swapping the flag:

Read the full README
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-... cargo run --example cli
GROQ_API_KEY=...        cargo run --example cli -- --provider groq --model openai/gpt-oss-120b
cargo run --example cli -- --api-url http://localhost:1234/v1 --model my-model   # LM Studio, llama.cpp, vLLM

Install

[dependencies]
yoagent = "0.27"
tokio = { version = "1", features = ["full"] }

Building for wasm32? Use default-features = false (see WebAssembly & Cloudflare Workers). On a native target keep the default native feature: without it reqwest has no TLS, and every HTTPS provider call fails at runtime.

Quick start

An agent that actually uses a tool — the thing the crate exists for:

use yoagent::provider::ModelConfig;
use yoagent::{tools, Agent, AgentEvent, StreamDelta};

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
    // The provider is selected from the config's protocol and the key is read
    // from ANTHROPIC_API_KEY. Call `.with_api_key(k)` to pass one explicitly.
    let mut agent = Agent::from_config(ModelConfig::claude_sonnet_5())
        .with_system_prompt("You are a coding assistant.")
        .with_tools(tools::default_tools());

    let mut events = agent.prompt("Find every TODO in src/ and summarise them").await;

    while let Some(event) = events.recv().await {
        match event {
            AgentEvent::MessageUpdate { delta: StreamDelta::Text { delta }, .. } => print!("{delta}"),
            AgentEvent::ToolExecutionStart { tool_name, .. } => println!("\n▶ {tool_name}"),
            AgentEvent::AgentEnd { .. } => break,
            _ => {}
        }
    }
    agent.finish().await;
}

Swap the model by swapping the config — the provider follows, and the key is read from that provider's conventional env var:

Agent::from_config(ModelConfig::groq("openai/gpt-oss-120b", "GPT-OSS 120B"));    // GROQ_API_KEY
Agent::from_config(ModelConfig::gemini_3_8_flash());                              // GEMINI_API_KEY
Agent::from_config(ModelConfig::ollama("http://localhost:11434/v1", "llama3.1:8b")); // no key

Why yoagent

Every agent runs the same loop, and almost every hand-written one gets the same things wrong: streams that end badly, tools that panic or hang, context that runs out, runs that never stop, spend nobody can account for. yoagent writes that loop once, with each guarantee pinned by a test, and keeps one rule for what goes in: does every agent need it, the same way? Anything else is an extension, a feature or a companion crate (design philosophy).

So it ships no vector stores, embedding pipelines, or task-graph layer — if your problem is retrieval or orchestration, one of these is the better fit:

If you needLook at
RAG pipelines, vector stores, embeddings, transcription and image generationrig — "Build modular and scalable LLM Applications in Rust"
Typed task graphs and streaming RAG indexing alongside agentsswiftide — "Composable LLM agents and harness, typed task graphs, and streaming RAG pipelines in Rust"
A tool-calling loop you host, gate, steer, branch, and recordyoagent

What that focus bought:

  • The loop is a free function. agent_loop() is stateless and takes everything it needs as arguments. Agent is an optional wrapper that adds history and queues. You can drive the loop yourself without adopting our state model.
  • 7 native wire protocols, not one OpenAI-compat shim with adapters bolted on. Anthropic Messages, OpenAI Completions, OpenAI Responses, Azure, Gemini, Vertex, and Bedrock each have a real implementation, so provider-specific features (thinking budgets, prompt-cache breakpoints, reasoning deltas) survive instead of being flattened away.
  • One plug-in contract for the whole run. An Extension can add tools, check input, allow, modify or deny each tool call, redact results, and check the final answer, with state that starts fresh each run. Install it as host policy and it governs every sub-agent too. Hooks that guard a call fail closed: a policy that cannot run denies, an input check rejects, a redaction that fails withholds.
  • Steer a run that's already going. Inject guidance mid-flight; it's picked up between tool batches without restarting the turn.
  • History is a tree, not a list. Session forks, checkpoints, and seeks. Edit an earlier turn and re-run it without destroying the original branch.
  • Runs are recordable. With features = ["gasp"], a run becomes an append-only semantic event log in a git repo — restore is clone + replay. Conformance-checked in CI.
  • The whole loop is testable offline. MockProvider scripts multi-turn tool-calling conversations and honours cancellation, so abort and steering paths are testable with no network or key.

Extend it

Everything that changes what the loop does goes through one contract, Extension: its run's RunHooks see on_input, before_model, before_tool, after_tool, on_stop, every event, and finish. A tool policy is a few lines:

use yoagent::extension::{ClonedHooks, RunHooks};
use yoagent::{ToolCallRequest, ToolDecision};

#[derive(Clone)]
struct NoForcePush;

#[async_trait::async_trait] // the `async-trait` crate
impl RunHooks for NoForcePush {
    async fn before_tool(&self, call: &ToolCallRequest<'_>) -> ToolDecision {
        let command = call.args["command"].as_str().unwrap_or_default();
        if command.contains("push --force") {
            ToolDecision::Deny("force-push is not allowed here".into())
        } else {
            ToolDecision::Allow
        }
    }
}

let agent = agent.with_extension(ClonedHooks::new("no-force-push", NoForcePush));

yoagent's own budget, tool gate and input guard are built the same way. Six runnable extension_* examples cover policies, redaction, verifiers, budgets, sub-agent policy and audit logs (guide).

Plugins and other ecosystems. yoagent-rutis turns rutis plugins — Rust, TypeScript (Node or Bun), Python or Go, loaded, reloaded and unloaded at runtime — into one Extension. Through small adapters it also runs many pi extensions and DeepSeek harness (DSH) tool plugins unchanged, with no change to yoagent's core: tools, tool policies, input checks, prompt additions and images cross over; commands and UI don't. An extension that hooks something the adapter can't enforce is refused, not half-run. How the 20 most-downloaded packages of each ecosystem fare (by monthly downloads, among npm's first 1000 search results per keyword), measured: plugin compatibility. Agents built this way — a coding agent with pi and DSH plugins in your browser, a handoff agent that asks without waiting and reports back — live in yobuild.

Runs where agents run

The same loop builds natively and for wasm32-unknown-unknown. In yoyo's Cloudflare Worker we measured about 4 ms to start and a median of ~45 ms of CPU per agent run — an agent spends most of a run waiting on the model, which Workers do not bill as CPU. A minimal Worker (one provider via Agent::from_provider, one tool, no decision model) is about 330 KiB gzipped. HTTP MCP works over the host's fetch; yoagent-workers turns the Workers AI binding into a decision model. See WebAssembly & Cloudflare Workers.


Built with yoagent

yoyo-evolve — a coding agent that evolves its own source in public. It began as 200 lines of Rust; every commit since has been agent-written and gated on tests. It runs on this loop with the openapi feature enabled.

Also built on yoagent:

ProjectWhat it is
rabA lightweight, extensible Rust coding agent
greatsage"Rimuru's Unique Skill, you know the one"
yoclawOpenClaw reborn in Rust — a single-binary agent that remembers you

Built something on yoagent? Open a PR and add it here — we'd like to see it.


What's in the box

The loopFull event stream; parallel, sequential or batched tools; steering and follow-ups; execution limits; retry with backoff and jitter; unanswered tool calls closedAgent loop · Events · Retry
ExtensionsOne plug-in contract for the run; on_stop sees cut-off answers too; Budget; the older hooks (ToolMiddleware, input filters, TurnHook, callbacks) still workExtensions · Callbacks
Providers7 native protocols reaching 20+ providers, or your own StreamProvider; thinking controls; prompt-cache hints; one context-overflow classifier; images sent the way each protocol takes them, or a text note with image_input offProviders · Prompt caching
Toolsbash, file read/write/edit, list_files, search; custom tools via one trait; MCP over stdio or HTTP; OpenAPI specs; ToolSources (refreshed mid-run, MCP list_changed included); per-file locking, images checked before sending, no overwrite after a partial read (ReadLog, on in default_tools())Tools · MCP · OpenAPI
Sub-agentsChild loops with their own model and tools; large artifacts passed by reference; spend rolled upSub-agents
ContextUsage-calibrated tracking, tiered compaction, optional LlmCompaction, loop detectionContext management
Sessions, skills, structured outputBranching session trees with JSONL; AgentSkills SKILL.md; typed prompt_structured::<T>()Sessions · Skills · Structured outputs
Decision models (decision)Typed yes/no, one-of-N and score judgments in a few hundred ms (Jev, Clef, OpenAI Decisions, any logprobs server); a tool gate and an input guardDecision models
Cost and telemetryOpt-in pricing (nothing priced by default); model limits from the same table, applied even with pricing off; SessionStats per run incl. sub-agents; tracing spans with tokens and costPricing · Telemetry
Recording (gasp)serde on every core type; runs recorded into a GASP repo, plugin logs too (opt-in)Persistence · GASP
WebAssembly--no-default-features for wasm32-unknown-unknown, e.g. Cloudflare WorkersWebAssembly & Workers

Examples

Seventeen of the 22 runnable examples in examples/ are below; ten need no API key at all (eleven counting cli with a local model). The rest are live-provider harnesses and offline evaluation sweeps.

ExampleWhat it showsKey needed
cliA ~400-line coding agent — all tools, skills, streaming, colored output. Like a baby Claude Codeoptional¹
rlmAn LLM that explores a codebase on its own by spawning sub-agentsyes
code_reviewThree sub-agents reviewing a diff in parallel, results mergedyes
shared_statePassing a large artifact between sub-agents by referenceyes
sub_agentDelegation basics with a per-sub-agent modelyes
basicThe smallest possible agentyes
callbacksLifecycle hooks and a custom toolno
persistenceSave and restore a sessionno
telemetrytracing spans with token and cost fieldsno
gasp_emitRecording a run into a GASP repono
decisionDecision-model questions in one line, and attaching a model to an agent (feature decision)yes
extension_policy, _redact, _verifier, _budget, _tree, _auditExtensions: a tool policy, redaction, a verifier, budgets, policy over sub-agents, an audit log (guide)no²

¹ --provider ollama or --api-url needs no key; hosted providers read their conventional env var.

² Scripted offline by default; -- --live uses DEEPSEEK_API_KEY or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY.

The companion crates have their own: language_plugins, pi_extensions and dsh_tools (TypeScript, Python, pi and DSH plugins) and a Clef tool-gate Worker.


Testing

MockProvider scripts a whole multi-turn tool-calling conversation with no network, and honours cancellation, so abort and steering paths are testable too. See Testing Your Agent; how the crate itself is tested and what CI runs is in CONTRIBUTING.


Documentation

MSRV is 1.86, enforced in CI. Raising it is a minor-version change.

Contributing

Bug reports, ideas and PRs are welcome — open an issue or pick one labelled help wanted. CONTRIBUTING covers building, the checks CI runs, and the PR checklist. Report security issues privately as described in SECURITY.

Acknowledgements

rutis, the plugin runtime behind yoagent-rutis, and the contributors who send fixes and ideas — including the ones who suggest them on X.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.

Runs on
GPU support unknown
What shows it
  • no dependency or feature matches a backend row
Native code
None found
  • No native code found
Python bindings
No Python binding crate found
License
MIT

Compare with similar projects

Order: strongest tier first, then most downloads, then name, with unmeasured values last. A library counts downloads over 30 days. An app counts binary downloads per release. An app with none counts its crate downloads over 30 days. ML Rust runs this catalogue, so its closest project always gets a row.

yoagent beside the projects that share a topic with it
ProjectDownloadsDependentsStarsLatest releaseRuns on (GPU)Native codeLicense
yoagent This page Listed

The agent loop for Rust: stream from 7 LLM protocols, run tools, loop until done. Native or wasm32 (Cloudflare Workers).

2,027 downloads over 30 days 5 369 0.27.4 GPU support unknown No native code found MIT
adk-rust Listed

Rust Agent Development Kit - Build AI agents in Rust with modular components for models, tools, memory, and more.

5,419 downloads over 30 days 25 743 2.3.0 CUDA, Metal Binds native code: alsa-sys (feature desktop-audio), audiopus_sys (feature openai-webrtc), cxx (feature livekit), espeak-rs-sys (feature kokoro), libsqlite3-sys (feature sqlite) and 4 more Apache-2.0

LangChain for Rust, the easiest way to write LLM-based programs in Rust

4,306 downloads over 30 days 4 1,362 8.0.0 GPU support unknown Binds native code: tree-sitter (feature tree-sitter), ort-sys (feature fastembed), ring (feature surrealdb), tree-sitter-language (feature tree-sitter). Build uses a native toolchain: cc (feature tree-sitter) MIT
chidori Listed

The agent framework where every run is durable, replayable, and resumable by default. Plain async TypeScript agents on an embedded pure-Rust JS engine.

Python bindings

257 downloads over 30 days 0 1,372 3.8.1 GPU support unknown Binds native code: aws-lc-rs, aws-lc-sys, lcms2-sys, libffi-sys, libsqlite3-sys and 4 more Apache-2.0
opencrabs App Listed

The autonomous, self-improving AI agent. Single Rust binary. Every channel. Recommended: the 40MB prebuilt binary for macOS, Linux and Windows: https://github.com/opencrabs/opencrabs/releases

125 binary downloads per release Not applicable 1,027 0.5.15 GPU support unknown Binds native code: libsqlite3-sys, llama-cpp-sys-2, opusic-sys (feature local-tts), tree-sitter (feature code-graph), alsa-sys (feature local-stt) and 1 more MIT
pi-rust App Listed

Rust-native, library-first coding-agent runtime and terminal CLI inspired by Pi, with composable LLM providers, tools, sessions, and plugin ABI

16 binary downloads per release Not applicable 231 Not measured Not measured MIT
axp App Listed

An open protocol that gives AI agents a secure, sandboxed place to run code and use tools — with lean context usage. AXP works alongside MCP

Not measured Not applicable 3 Not measured Not measured Not measured Apache-2.0
Why ListedNo archive, New or Featured rule places it, so it is Listed.

What it lacks for Featured

  • It has 1 active dependents and 1 new dependents in 365 days. Featured needs 11 active dependents or 9 new dependents in 365 days. The repository route reads 369 stars, 53 forks and 6 contributors. It needs 4,539 stars, 434 forks and 79 contributors together.

What else the check found

  • The last activity is on 8 Nov 2026, 1 day ago. The rules expect an update within 450 days. Dormancy rule

Exact rules: Listed, Featured library. The check on applied thresholds version 9.

Every rule outcome, as the check records it
  • expected-interval: version 0.27.4 base 450: E = 450 days
  • dormancy: last activity 2026-11-08, 1 days ago, E = 450: active
  • featured: not featured: active_users 1 < 11 and new_adopters 1 < 9 and repository route stars 369 (needs 4539), forks 53 (needs 434), contributors 6 (needs 79)
  • listed: listed: no archive, new or featured rule applies
Crates3 crates

Measurements and sources

Each signal row shows the raw value, its source and the fetch date. The Sources list gathers every distinct source on this page. Movement needs more history.

Sources6 sources
Adoption1 active dependents, 1 new dependents in 365 days1 not measured
Adoption measurements
SignalValueSourceFetchedCounts
Active dependents1crates.io database dumpYes
New dependents (365 days)1crates.io database dumpYes
Peak active dependents2crates.io database dumpYes
Active dependents as a share of the peak1crates.io database dumpYes
Binary downloads per releaseNot measuredYes
MaintenanceLatest human commit: 1 day ago3 not measured
Maintenance measurements
SignalValueSourceFetchedCounts
Latest human commit2026-11-08GitHub repositoryYes
Latest release2026-11-07crates.io database dumpYes
First release2026-02-17crates.io database dumpYes
Latest version0.27.4crates.io database dumpYes
Days the oldest outside issue waits for a reply0GitHub repositoryYes
Maintainer replies over 365 days31GitHub repositoryYes
Repository archivedfalseGitHub repositoryYes
Repository gonefalseGitHub repositoryYes
Release commit or manifest in the repotruecrates.io packageYes
Published docstruecrates.io database dumpYes
Latest release fails cargo checkNot measuredYes
Build check dateNot measuredYes
Build check toolchainNot measuredYes
SecurityUnpatched vulnerabilities: none
Security measurements
SignalValueSourceFetchedCounts
Unpatched vulnerabilities past the grace windownoneRustSec advisory databaseYes
RustSec unmaintained advisorynoneRustSec advisory databaseYes
Deprecation noticenonecrates.io database dumpYes
Deprecated requirementnonecrates.io database dumpYes
Distribution83 releases, 2,027 downloads over 30 days5 not measured
Distribution measurements
SignalValueSourceFetchedCounts
Releases83crates.io database dumpYes
Downloads over 30 days2027crates.io database dumpYes
Binary downloads over the last 3 releasesNot measuredYes
Homebrew installs on request over 365 daysNot measuredYes
Repology repository familiesNot measuredYes
Docker pull growth over 90 daysNot measuredYes
Docker pulls at the growth baselineNot measuredYes
Every version a prereleasefalsecrates.io database dumpYes
Every version 0.0.xfalsecrates.io database dumpYes
Every version yankedfalsecrates.io database dumpYes
Crate deleted from crates.iofalsecrates.io database dumpYes
Repository369 stars, 53 forks, 6 contributors, 464 commits. Stars alone never qualify a project.
Repository measurements
SignalValueSourceFetchedCounts
GitHub stars369GitHub repositoryYes — one part of the repository route
GitHub forks53GitHub repositoryYes — one part of the repository route
Contributors with a GitHub account6GitHub contributorsYes — one part of the repository route
Commits on the default branch464GitHub repositoryNo
Repository's main crate left out of the entrynonecrates.io database dumpYes
Facts that never count
Facts that never count measurements
SignalValueSourceFetchedCounts
LicenseMITcrates.io database dumpNo
Runs on, from listed crates and their direct dependenciesGPU support unknowncrates.io database dumpNo
What shows each backendno dependency or feature matches a backend rowcrates.io database dumpNo
Native code, from listed crates and their dependenciesNo native code foundcrates.io database dumpNo
Python bindings, from direct dependencies of listed cratesNo Python binding crate foundcrates.io database dumpNo
Crates that depend on a listed crate directly5crates.io database dumpNo

Corrections and review history

Report a correction

No correction applies to this entry.

Judgments

A judgment enters only through an approved issue and a merged pull request.

No judgment applies to this entry.